The Effect of Expected Value on Attraction Effect Preference Reversals
نویسندگان
چکیده
The attraction effect shows that adding a third alternative to a choice set can alter preference between the original two options. For over 30 years, this simple demonstration of context dependence has been taken as strong evidence against a class of parsimonious value-maximising models that evaluate alternatives independently from one another. Significantly, however, in previous demonstrations of the attraction effect alternatives are approximately equally valuable, so there was little consequence to the decision maker irrespective of which alternative was selected. Here we vary the difference in expected value between alternatives and provide the first demonstration that, although extinguished with large differences, this theoretically important effect persists when choice between alternatives has a consequence. We use this result to clarify the implications of the attraction effect, arguing that although it robustly violates the assumptions of value-maximising models, it does not eliminate the possibility that human decision making is optimal.
منابع مشابه
Why Contextual Preference Reversals Maximize Expected Value
Contextual preference reversals occur when a preference for one option over another is reversed by the addition of further options. It has been argued that the occurrence of preference reversals in human behavior shows that people violate the axioms of rational choice and that people are not, therefore, expected value maximizers. In contrast, we demonstrate that if a person is only able to make...
متن کاملPreference Reversals in Decision Making Under Risk are Accompanied by Changes in Attention to Different Attributes
Recent work has shown that visual fixations reflect and influence trial-to-trial variability in people's preferences between goods. Here we extend this principle to attribute weights during decision making under risk. We measured eye movements while people chose between two risky gambles or bid on a single gamble. Consistent with previous work, we found that people exhibited systematic preferen...
متن کاملModeration of Preference Reversals in the Long Run
This study explored how preference reversals, induced by changes in response mode (choice vs. pricing), are moderated by how lotteries are represented, as being played 1, 10, or 100 times. Ss chose which of a pair of gambles they preferred to play and determined the minimum selling price of each gamble. Replicating previous research, the preference reversal was obtained for single-play represen...
متن کاملDecisions with Errors
This paper presents a new theory of decision making with errors. The proposed theory explains all major violations of expected utility theory such as the preference reversal phenomenon (including the strong reversals and the preference reversals with the probability equivalents), the common consequence effect (the Allais paradox), the common ratio effect, the violations of the betweenness axiom...
متن کاملThe Fragile Nature of Contextual Preference Reversals 1 RUNNING HEAD: The Fragile Nature of Contextual Preference Reversals The Fragile Nature of Contextual Preference Reversals: Reply to Tsetsos, Chater, and Usher
Trueblood, Brown, and Heathcote (2014) developed a new model, called the Multiattribute Linear Ballistic Accumulator (MLBA), to explain contextual preference reversals in multi-alternative choice. MLBA was shown to provide good accounts of human behavior through both qualitative analyses and quantitative fitting of choice data. Tsetsos, Chater, and Usher (in press) investigated the ability of M...
متن کامل